The overview on technical
and product innovations is in the table following the title. There it is
possible to buy a desired innovation in three steps ("Overview",
"Detailed Description" and "All Rights") through a simple
click and thus the prospective customer can reduce it's
risk through little effort.
This solution offers to
both parts (investor and inventor) advantages. Here something about that and the nascence of
this site:
|
Clearly bound to
my life - experience, some questions built up in my mind: Why
should innovation be national, why bound to a language or country? Isn't it
that every real valuable innovation passes all kind of limits like:
geographical, borders, even time? In our
trial to make life easier and nicer, aren't we all together? I'm very
convinced that everybody has the right to an anyway unavoidable egoism, seen
personal and for communities, like nations. But this egoism can be chosen in
a way to be an advantage (or at least acceptable) for all the other egoistic
human interests on earth, which are good willing and do not attack or damage
others. Isn't it? Good business is the perfect example, I believe A good
way to live ones own egoism and to be undoubtful an advantage for the society
is innovation, but it is not easy to transform it in a real advantage for all
sides On my
way to make product ideas and technical innovations, which I was convinced to
be an advantage for the later user, in real objects and money, I found a lot
of difficulties like: protecting the idea / innovation (patent, trademark,
industrial property right). A product idea without technical innovation is
almost not possible to protect search for
partners search for
money (capital investment) or prospective buyers protection
from egoism and hatred of other society members which are not good willing ... The way
from having useful ideas to making them useful is generally hard and long.
When reasons occur to change the country we are living in, should this make
all these trials or their start impossible? Can
useful innovation happen today just from experts in an environment where it
was planed and expected and where it can easily be exploited? How many good
solutions are lost with this restriction? Shouldn't
the financial return expected from a solution be taken mostly by those,
contributing to its implementation? Avoiding national limits grows chances
for implementation, lifts number of potential users
and reduces the time to availability, isn't it? Gathering
ideas from everyone gives a good view on the market, the actual demand.
Especially it shows, where a need for a solution is seen, giving also a
solution. Therefore the market chances for innovation happening outside of
research centers are better than many investors or potential buyers estimate.
Doesn't this worth to think about it? Starting from
this thoughts and considering possibilities, I had the idea to create an
Internet platform where generally everyone can present in a first instance
anonymous his / her product idea or innovation without having to face the above mentioned difficulties and risks.
This due to the special relationship: owner of the idea (solution) – Internet platform –
investor or prospective customer. The investors risk is reduced due to a first
check of the innovation from the platform owner. The customers risk is reduced even
more through the possibility to buy information and rights about an idea /
innovation in three steps. This way makes possible to reduce the risk with
little effort. |
|
|
|
Last changed: